| |
Racing Forum
Not really
Posted By: StevieY In Response To: interesting...i would've thought much lower odds (ricky)
Date: 15 May 02, 5:19 pm
Winning the first two legs doesn't put you in the same class with Secretariat. Secretariat was a freak of nature. That Belmont win of 31 lengths will never be repeated. 1.60 was about where Charismatic probably should have been. Great horse, no doubt, but not Big Red, and winning the triple crown doesn't make you Big Red either.
- a difference -- ricky -- 15 May 02, 1:23 am
- Well said, and I would need to study to even get up to knowing "little" -- Fezzik -- 15 May 02, 3:21 am
- One note -- StevieY -- 15 May 02, 8:42 am
- correction and comment -- Dunbar -- 15 May 02, 9:46 am
- Didn't mean to say he would win the Preakness -- StevieY -- 15 May 02, 9:58 am
- lengths of races -- ricky -- 15 May 02, 10:39 am
- Lengths -- StevieY -- 15 May 02, 10:42 am
- Maybe you were thinking of Charismatic -- Dunbar -- 15 May 02, 11:52 am
- Yes, that's who it was. Thanks. (nt) -- StevieY -- 15 May 02, 11:54 am
- how did he do in the Belmont -- ricky -- 15 May 02, 12:00 pm
- Finished 3rd in 1999 Belmont -- DowntownMan -- 15 May 02, 12:33 pm
- might have won, but... -- Dunbar -- 15 May 02, 1:15 pm
- interesting...i would've thought much lower odds -- ricky -- 15 May 02, 2:06 pm
- Not really -- StevieY -- 15 May 02, 5:19 pm
- interesting...i would've thought much lower odds -- ricky -- 15 May 02, 2:06 pm
- might have won, but... -- Dunbar -- 15 May 02, 1:15 pm
- how did he do in the Belmont -- ricky -- 15 May 02, 12:00 pm
- Lengths -- StevieY -- 15 May 02, 10:42 am
- lengths of races -- ricky -- 15 May 02, 10:39 am
- Didn't mean to say he would win the Preakness -- StevieY -- 15 May 02, 9:58 am
- correction and comment -- Dunbar -- 15 May 02, 9:46 am
- One note -- StevieY -- 15 May 02, 8:42 am
- Well said, and I would need to study to even get up to knowing "little" -- Fezzik -- 15 May 02, 3:21 am
| |
Racing Forum is maintained by Pi Yee Press