| |
MLB Forum
Updated vig.
Posted By: James In Response To: Variance? (James)
Date: 10 Aug 01, 4:27 pm
Just re-shopped NL futures and came up with -7% vig. AL vig down to just 4%. The greater vig in the AL is of course due to having not one but TWO public teams that are virtual locks to get into the postseason. I think the reductions from my previous numbers are because a couple of my books just re-calibrated by tossing out all the hopeless teams.
- AL regular season records: Monte Carlo study -- Colin Caster -- 8 Aug 01, 10:58 pm
- NL Monte Carlo -- Colin Caster -- 8 Aug 01, 11:36 pm
- Adjustment -- Editor -- 9 Aug 01, 7:43 am
- Definitely -- Colin Caster -- 10 Aug 01, 8:58 pm
- Refinements -- James -- 10 Aug 01, 3:08 pm
- Monte Carlo -- StevieY -- 10 Aug 01, 3:17 pm
- Agreed. -- Colin Caster -- 12 Aug 01, 10:29 pm
- Negative correlation between results -- Colin Caster -- 12 Aug 01, 10:26 pm
- Agreed. -- Colin Caster -- 12 Aug 01, 10:29 pm
- Definitely -- Colin Caster -- 10 Aug 01, 8:58 pm
- Variance? -- James -- 10 Aug 01, 3:41 pm
- Updated vig. -- James -- 10 Aug 01, 4:27 pm
- Good sim ideas -- Colin Caster -- 12 Aug 01, 10:34 pm
- Futures surveys -- James -- 13 Aug 01, 12:48 am
- Good sim ideas -- Colin Caster -- 12 Aug 01, 10:34 pm
- Adjustment -- Editor -- 9 Aug 01, 7:43 am
- NL Monte Carlo -- Colin Caster -- 8 Aug 01, 11:36 pm
| |
MLB Forum is maintained by Pi Yee Press