| |
MLB Forum
A little more info
Posted By: Zoso In Response To: Bases, parlaying totals to sides (Fezzik)
Date: 8 Aug 01, 9:17 am
I was curious to see whether there was a subset within the data that could have worked mechanically over the four years. Here is the data from the four segments:
Road dogs (over) 1367-1725 (+113.5 units) +3.7% ROI
Road favs (over) 824-569 (+48.3 units) +3.5% ROIHome dogs (under) 613-684 (+90.4 units) +7.0% ROI
Home favs (under) 1951-1372 (+71.5 units) +2.2% ROIFrom 1996-1999, only the home dogs would have overcome the 4.55% vig from the totals.
Overall, if the average line on your totals is -110, by parlaying the corresonding side with your total, you have reduced the vig from 4.55% to about 1.5% (a line of about -103) and only need to hit about 50.7% of your totals instead of 52.4% to make a profit.
BTW:
The average score when the away team wins is 10.04
The average score when the home team wins is 9.63
Difference of 0.41 runs
- Bases, parlaying totals to sides -- Fezzik -- 5 Aug 01, 12:16 am
- Some data -- Zoso -- 6 Aug 01, 11:38 am
- Nice, thanks. (nt) -- Colin Caster -- 6 Aug 01, 2:19 pm
- A little more info -- Zoso -- 8 Aug 01, 9:17 am
- Wouldn't the AL totals be skewed.... -- Allan -- 10 Aug 01, 11:32 pm
- Nice, thanks. (nt) -- Colin Caster -- 6 Aug 01, 2:19 pm
- Some data -- Zoso -- 6 Aug 01, 11:38 am
| |
MLB Forum is maintained by Pi Yee Press