| |
General Forum
More data will come
Posted By: Stanford Wong In Response To: More data is required (John May)
Date: 22 Aug 01, 1:39 pm
I agree that more data are required. Unfortunately, gathering data on prediction accuracy means waiting for more games to be predicted and then played.
I will post my own picks on my private NFL page as soon as I have them firmed up, which ought to be on Wednesdays or Thursdays. I'll also post them on the free Football Forum page on Sunday before the games start, so that anyone who wants to can track my picks without having to pay to do the tracking. If the time ever comes when you decide you would rather have those picks a few days early so that you have time to bet on them yourself, you can sign up to do so.
Right now the price of my private NFL page is $49 for the season. I set that price figuring that based on my 2000 NFL performance, there is no market for my 2001 NFL picks. I'm hoping a few people will be willing to pay $49 for the right to join in on the discussions on my NFL page for the season, even if they totally ignore my picks. Thus I see the membership fee as being $49 for the discussions and $0 for the picks. If my NFL picks start to do well, then I will be able to charge for future picks instead of giving them away for free.
As for Dan Gordon's picks, I'm hoping he also makes them available to be tracked for free, even if they become available too late for us to bet on them ourselves. The competitor inside me wants very much to be able to compare my picks to Dan's on a week-to-week basis. I'd love to finish the NFL season with a higher percentage of winners than Dan does.
Stanford Wong
- a question -- Arthur -- 21 Aug 01, 5:11 pm
- answers -- Stanford Wong -- 21 Aug 01, 7:05 pm
- Virtually all attainable -- Don Schlesinger -- 21 Aug 01, 7:36 pm
- More data is required -- John May -- 22 Aug 01, 11:03 am
- More data will come -- Stanford Wong -- 22 Aug 01, 1:39 pm
- Highly doubtful -- Don Schlesinger -- 22 Aug 01, 7:02 pm
- Don, you are one lovable smartass! (nt) -- Compador -- 22 Aug 01, 8:01 pm
- Chunk Bet -- Fezzik -- 22 Aug 01, 10:40 pm
- Wong +500 looks resonable -- Math Boy -- 23 Aug 01, 8:22 am
- I'm impressed -- Don Schlesinger -- 23 Aug 01, 9:33 am
- not that great an estimate -- Math Boy -- 23 Aug 01, 3:47 pm
- Spoilsport -- John May -- 23 Aug 01, 4:09 pm
- DonS is running the wrong way! -- fezzik's chunk bet -- 23 Aug 01, 11:15 pm
- Eye of the beholder -- Don Schlesinger -- 24 Aug 01, 8:36 am
- you're not as smart as i thought you were -- docriver -- 24 Aug 01, 10:06 am
- Strange thought processes -- Don Schlesinger -- 24 Aug 01, 5:13 pm
- you believe because you know him...but what about us? -- docriver -- 24 Aug 01, 5:28 pm
- Honest answers -- Don Schlesinger -- 24 Aug 01, 6:36 pm
- Four years -- docriver -- 24 Aug 01, 5:30 pm
- 219/391 -- Don Schlesinger -- 24 Aug 01, 6:40 pm
- a little math question -- docriver -- 24 Aug 01, 6:43 pm
- Math question -- Colin Caster -- 24 Aug 01, 8:06 pm
- Suggestion: List those 391 picks -- Stanford Wong -- 24 Aug 01, 8:34 pm
- Just asking -- Don Schlesinger -- 24 Aug 01, 9:07 pm
- Don, isn't this two-faced? -- Fezzik -- 25 Aug 01, 12:20 am
- No new picks with old prices, please -- Stanford Wong -- 25 Aug 01, 7:14 am
- Always boils down to the same thing -- Don Schlesinger -- 25 Aug 01, 8:54 am
- No new picks with old prices, please -- Stanford Wong -- 25 Aug 01, 7:14 am
- Don, isn't this two-faced? -- Fezzik -- 25 Aug 01, 12:20 am
- Math question -- Colin Caster -- 24 Aug 01, 8:06 pm
- a little math question -- docriver -- 24 Aug 01, 6:43 pm
- Honest answers -- Don Schlesinger -- 24 Aug 01, 6:36 pm
- you believe because you know him...but what about us? -- docriver -- 24 Aug 01, 5:28 pm
- Classic DonS Deflection Post -- Fezzik -- 24 Aug 01, 8:56 pm
- Too serious -- Don Schlesinger -- 25 Aug 01, 8:45 am
- I think you touched some nerves Don -- DowntownMan -- 25 Aug 01, 1:26 pm
- I don't expect an answer . . . -- Don Schlesinger -- 25 Aug 01, 5:56 pm
- Good post! -- Fezzik -- 25 Aug 01, 9:01 pm
- I don't expect an answer . . . -- Don Schlesinger -- 25 Aug 01, 5:56 pm
- I think you touched some nerves Don -- DowntownMan -- 25 Aug 01, 1:26 pm
- Strange thought processes -- Don Schlesinger -- 24 Aug 01, 5:13 pm
- you're not as smart as i thought you were -- docriver -- 24 Aug 01, 10:06 am
- Spoilsport -- John May -- 23 Aug 01, 4:09 pm
- not that great an estimate -- Math Boy -- 23 Aug 01, 3:47 pm
- I'm impressed -- Don Schlesinger -- 23 Aug 01, 9:33 am
- Chunk Bet -- Fezzik -- 22 Aug 01, 10:40 pm
- Don, you are one lovable smartass! (nt) -- Compador -- 22 Aug 01, 8:01 pm
- Question re: " correction to the Gordon sample". -- samo666 -- 23 Aug 01, 2:43 am
- You need to look at the total number of touts tested -- John May -- 23 Aug 01, 3:07 am
- Asinine analysis -- Don Schlesinger -- 23 Aug 01, 9:36 am
- Er...why? -- John May -- 23 Aug 01, 1:13 pm
- Guess you can't read -- Don Schlesinger -- 23 Aug 01, 4:34 pm
- Corrections & Honest Touts -- Bob Fisher -- 23 Aug 01, 5:29 pm
- Quite misguided analysis -- Don Schlesinger -- 23 Aug 01, 8:53 pm
- Baccarat vs touting -- John May -- 24 Aug 01, 12:24 pm
- I thank God every day -- Don Schlesinger -- 24 Aug 01, 5:28 pm
- Quite misguided analysis -- Don Schlesinger -- 23 Aug 01, 8:53 pm
- Corrections & Honest Touts -- Bob Fisher -- 23 Aug 01, 5:29 pm
- Guess you can't read -- Don Schlesinger -- 23 Aug 01, 4:34 pm
- Er...why? -- John May -- 23 Aug 01, 1:13 pm
- Asinine analysis -- Don Schlesinger -- 23 Aug 01, 9:36 am
- Highly doubtful -- Don Schlesinger -- 22 Aug 01, 7:02 pm
- More data is required -- John May -- 22 Aug 01, 11:03 am
- What makes Stanford Wong an authority on football wagering? -- Colin Caster -- 21 Aug 01, 11:10 pm
- Wong has established -- John May -- 22 Aug 01, 4:39 am
- Virtually all attainable -- Don Schlesinger -- 21 Aug 01, 7:36 pm
- answers -- Stanford Wong -- 21 Aug 01, 7:05 pm
| |
General Forum is maintained by Pi Yee Press