| |
General Forum
answers
Posted By: Stanford Wong In Response To: a question (Arthur)
Date: 21 Aug 01, 7:05 pm
What makes Stanford Wong an authority on football wagering? I hear he lost big time last year.
Read Sharp Sports Betting and decide for yourself whether I know anything about football wagering.
I did lose money betting on the NFL last year. However, my aggregate lifetime sports-betting win is approaching six figures. I expect to win on the NFL this year. I have won money every week of the NFL preseason this year, meaning the games of 4-20 August 2001.
And, where can one find an independent third party documentation of Dan Gordon’s alleged record? Does it exist? Thank you.
Don Schlesinger says Dan Gordon has gone 269-202 against the spread over the past five years. Don Schlesinger is as honest as they come. Don also admits that the 269-202 is against the spreads reported by Gordon, and that Gordon sometimes gets to bet against spreads better than anyone in Las Vegas can find. The game-by-game record of those 471 bets is not available anywhere on the Internet as far as I know, so we are not able to figure out how well Gordon would have done against neutral spreads. My best guess is he would have gone about 54% over the past five years against neutral spreads, but I have no backup for that number.
Stanford Wong
- a question -- Arthur -- 21 Aug 01, 5:11 pm
- answers -- Stanford Wong -- 21 Aug 01, 7:05 pm
- Virtually all attainable -- Don Schlesinger -- 21 Aug 01, 7:36 pm
- More data is required -- John May -- 22 Aug 01, 11:03 am
- More data will come -- Stanford Wong -- 22 Aug 01, 1:39 pm
- Highly doubtful -- Don Schlesinger -- 22 Aug 01, 7:02 pm
- Don, you are one lovable smartass! (nt) -- Compador -- 22 Aug 01, 8:01 pm
- Chunk Bet -- Fezzik -- 22 Aug 01, 10:40 pm
- Wong +500 looks resonable -- Math Boy -- 23 Aug 01, 8:22 am
- I'm impressed -- Don Schlesinger -- 23 Aug 01, 9:33 am
- not that great an estimate -- Math Boy -- 23 Aug 01, 3:47 pm
- Spoilsport -- John May -- 23 Aug 01, 4:09 pm
- DonS is running the wrong way! -- fezzik's chunk bet -- 23 Aug 01, 11:15 pm
- Eye of the beholder -- Don Schlesinger -- 24 Aug 01, 8:36 am
- you're not as smart as i thought you were -- docriver -- 24 Aug 01, 10:06 am
- Strange thought processes -- Don Schlesinger -- 24 Aug 01, 5:13 pm
- you believe because you know him...but what about us? -- docriver -- 24 Aug 01, 5:28 pm
- Honest answers -- Don Schlesinger -- 24 Aug 01, 6:36 pm
- Four years -- docriver -- 24 Aug 01, 5:30 pm
- 219/391 -- Don Schlesinger -- 24 Aug 01, 6:40 pm
- a little math question -- docriver -- 24 Aug 01, 6:43 pm
- Math question -- Colin Caster -- 24 Aug 01, 8:06 pm
- Suggestion: List those 391 picks -- Stanford Wong -- 24 Aug 01, 8:34 pm
- Just asking -- Don Schlesinger -- 24 Aug 01, 9:07 pm
- Don, isn't this two-faced? -- Fezzik -- 25 Aug 01, 12:20 am
- No new picks with old prices, please -- Stanford Wong -- 25 Aug 01, 7:14 am
- Always boils down to the same thing -- Don Schlesinger -- 25 Aug 01, 8:54 am
- No new picks with old prices, please -- Stanford Wong -- 25 Aug 01, 7:14 am
- Don, isn't this two-faced? -- Fezzik -- 25 Aug 01, 12:20 am
- Math question -- Colin Caster -- 24 Aug 01, 8:06 pm
- a little math question -- docriver -- 24 Aug 01, 6:43 pm
- Honest answers -- Don Schlesinger -- 24 Aug 01, 6:36 pm
- you believe because you know him...but what about us? -- docriver -- 24 Aug 01, 5:28 pm
- Classic DonS Deflection Post -- Fezzik -- 24 Aug 01, 8:56 pm
- Too serious -- Don Schlesinger -- 25 Aug 01, 8:45 am
- I think you touched some nerves Don -- DowntownMan -- 25 Aug 01, 1:26 pm
- I don't expect an answer . . . -- Don Schlesinger -- 25 Aug 01, 5:56 pm
- Good post! -- Fezzik -- 25 Aug 01, 9:01 pm
- I don't expect an answer . . . -- Don Schlesinger -- 25 Aug 01, 5:56 pm
- I think you touched some nerves Don -- DowntownMan -- 25 Aug 01, 1:26 pm
- Strange thought processes -- Don Schlesinger -- 24 Aug 01, 5:13 pm
- you're not as smart as i thought you were -- docriver -- 24 Aug 01, 10:06 am
- Spoilsport -- John May -- 23 Aug 01, 4:09 pm
- not that great an estimate -- Math Boy -- 23 Aug 01, 3:47 pm
- I'm impressed -- Don Schlesinger -- 23 Aug 01, 9:33 am
- Chunk Bet -- Fezzik -- 22 Aug 01, 10:40 pm
- Don, you are one lovable smartass! (nt) -- Compador -- 22 Aug 01, 8:01 pm
- Question re: " correction to the Gordon sample". -- samo666 -- 23 Aug 01, 2:43 am
- You need to look at the total number of touts tested -- John May -- 23 Aug 01, 3:07 am
- Asinine analysis -- Don Schlesinger -- 23 Aug 01, 9:36 am
- Er...why? -- John May -- 23 Aug 01, 1:13 pm
- Guess you can't read -- Don Schlesinger -- 23 Aug 01, 4:34 pm
- Corrections & Honest Touts -- Bob Fisher -- 23 Aug 01, 5:29 pm
- Quite misguided analysis -- Don Schlesinger -- 23 Aug 01, 8:53 pm
- Baccarat vs touting -- John May -- 24 Aug 01, 12:24 pm
- I thank God every day -- Don Schlesinger -- 24 Aug 01, 5:28 pm
- Quite misguided analysis -- Don Schlesinger -- 23 Aug 01, 8:53 pm
- Corrections & Honest Touts -- Bob Fisher -- 23 Aug 01, 5:29 pm
- Guess you can't read -- Don Schlesinger -- 23 Aug 01, 4:34 pm
- Er...why? -- John May -- 23 Aug 01, 1:13 pm
- Asinine analysis -- Don Schlesinger -- 23 Aug 01, 9:36 am
- Highly doubtful -- Don Schlesinger -- 22 Aug 01, 7:02 pm
- More data is required -- John May -- 22 Aug 01, 11:03 am
- What makes Stanford Wong an authority on football wagering? -- Colin Caster -- 21 Aug 01, 11:10 pm
- Wong has established -- John May -- 22 Aug 01, 4:39 am
- Virtually all attainable -- Don Schlesinger -- 21 Aug 01, 7:36 pm
- answers -- Stanford Wong -- 21 Aug 01, 7:05 pm
| |
General Forum is maintained by Pi Yee Press