[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

General Forum

I'm in the same boat. I won't hedge.

Posted By: Stanford Wong
Date: 13 Aug 01, 8:57 am

In Response To: How to handle the "huge exposure game" (Fezzik)

In general, IMO, the average bettor tends to way overhedge these situations. As an example, I personally have about 10k coming in if I win my Eagles +8.5 teaser tomorrow. This is more than I expected to have, but every team I teased the Eagles with won this week. Since the line is currently 2, many would advocate I play back Balt -2 to lock in a profit, and have a great shot at a middle. I equate this to insuring a blackjack; it gets the money, but is a poor Expected Value play. I'd much rather roll the dice with the Eagles (the team I like to cover even at +2) than place any bet 11/10 on a team I think will cover less than 50% at that number.

Whether the Eagles cover the teased spread in that game makes more than $10K of difference to me. But the thought of hedging never entered my mind. If I am not comfortable taking that sort of risk, I would not enter into the bets in the first place. SL covering last night made the same dollars of difference to me, and I did not think about hedging it either.

This has been a good weekend, even if the Eagles do not come through for us. :-)

Stanford WOng

Password:

Messages In This Thread

How to handle the "huge exposure game" -- Fezzik -- 12 Aug 01, 11:53 pm
So, will you be hedging against the Mariners in October? -- James -- 13 Aug 01, 12:33 am
Difference between A's and Eagles -- StevieY -- 13 Aug 01, 11:35 am
that's not a hedge -- docriver -- 13 Aug 01, 12:10 pm
Yes and no -- StevieY -- 13 Aug 01, 12:33 pm
risk -- docriver -- 13 Aug 01, 1:04 pm
Hedging -- StevieY -- 13 Aug 01, 1:38 pm
Example please? -- docriver -- 13 Aug 01, 1:56 pm
Example -- StevieY -- 13 Aug 01, 5:36 pm
because you have 40x in equity now -- docriver -- 13 Aug 01, 6:01 pm
above title should read : 18x, not 40x (nt) -- docriver -- 13 Aug 01, 6:08 pm
You aren't wagering 18,000+ -- StevieY -- 13 Aug 01, 6:11 pm
Agree to disagree -- docriver -- 13 Aug 01, 6:20 pm
You are both right, even disagreeing -- Fezzik -- 15 Aug 01, 1:32 am
Size your bets according the payoff, not the bet size. -- Stanford Wong -- 13 Aug 01, 6:39 pm
he really has found some arbitrage -- Math Boy -- 13 Aug 01, 8:21 pm
You can always overbet if the marginal EV from betting more is less than th -- docriver -- 13 Aug 01, 8:41 pm
Practical issues -- James -- 14 Aug 01, 11:27 am
i'm the minority -- docriver -- 13 Aug 01, 8:38 pm
hedging futures bets -- rainmandon -- 21 Aug 01, 7:51 pm
I understand the bet... -- StevieY -- 21 Aug 01, 7:58 pm
hedging futures -- rainmandon -- 21 Aug 01, 9:22 pm
I understand the bet... -- StevieY -- 22 Aug 01, 6:40 pm
Sea hedge -- Fezzik -- 15 Aug 01, 1:34 am
Oops.......I showed my Sea Bias -- Fezzik -- 15 Aug 01, 1:36 am
I'm in the same boat. I won't hedge. -- Stanford Wong -- 13 Aug 01, 8:57 am
Risk-averse betting? -- John May -- 13 Aug 01, 9:14 am
Agree -- Don Schlesinger -- 14 Aug 01, 1:11 pm
1 investment question -- Fezzik -- 15 Aug 01, 2:29 am
Attempt at some answers -- Don Schlesinger -- 15 Aug 01, 8:13 am
how much does money mean to you? -- docriver -- 15 Aug 01, 8:39 am
In-the-money options -- Jaeger -- 23 Aug 01, 6:44 pm
No -- Don Schlesinger -- 23 Aug 01, 8:55 pm
Risk-averse betting? -- lepto -- 14 Aug 01, 1:33 pm
Your bet suffered turf toe -- McNabb#1 -- 14 Aug 01, 4:24 am

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If you'd like to include a link to another page with your message,
please provide both the URL address and the title of the page:

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:

If you'd like to have the option of deleting your post later,
please provide a password (CASE SENSITIVE!):

Password:

If you'd like e-mail notification of responses, please check this box:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

General Forum is maintained by Pi Yee Press